Time： Popularity：0times
Hello everyone! In industrial coating and home decoration, the quality of powder coatings directly affects the appearance, protective performance, and lifespan of products. But faced with the dazzling array of powder coating products on the market, do you know how to quickly and accurately distinguish between good and bad quality? Do you know any simple and practical methods for identifying powder coatings? Below, we'll break down seven core identification techniques to help you easily become a powder coating expert!
The feel is the most direct way to judge the quality of powder coatings. High-quality powder and low-quality powder feel vastly different.
High-quality powder coatings have uniform and fine particles. When held in the hand, they feel smooth and fluffy, like dry quicksand, easily sliding naturally from the fingertips without any resistance. This smoothness comes from the reasonable particle size distribution of high-quality powder, the absence of coarse impurities, and excellent flowability. This is the basis for its ability to disperse evenly and form a smooth coating during spraying.
Inferior powder coatings feel completely different. A handful will feel noticeably rough and dry, with a strong granular texture; you might even feel small lumps or sand particles. This type of powder not only has poor flowability but also easily clumps due to moisture absorption and particle adhesion, making it difficult to disperse even with gentle rubbing. The main reason for this is that inferior powders use low-purity raw materials and have rudimentary processing techniques, failing to achieve uniform particle size or exhibiting inadequate moisture protection during storage, leading to moisture absorption and clumping. This results in uneven spraying and a grainy coating during subsequent use.
When purchasing powder coatings, many people overlook the relationship between "weight and volume," but this is precisely a key indicator of its cost-effectiveness and quality. The core logic lies in the difference in filler content.
The main components of powder coatings include core raw materials such as resin, pigments, and curing agents, as well as fillers such as talc and calcium carbonate. The cost of fillers is far lower than that of core raw materials, and some manufacturers add excessive amounts of fillers to reduce costs. Because fillers are much denser than core ingredients, for the same weight, a higher filler content results in a smaller powder volume; conversely, a lower filler content and a higher proportion of core ingredients result in a larger powder volume.
Simply put, for two batches of powder coatings of the same weight, the larger batch indicates a lower filler content and more high-quality core ingredients such as resin and pigments, resulting in superior quality. The smaller batch often has a higher filler content and insufficient core ingredients, leading to lower cost and significantly reduced coating performance, adhesion, and other key indicators. This explains why some powder coatings have similar packaging dimensions, with some labeled 20kg and others reaching 25kg – the difference is essentially due to varying filler content. When purchasing, you can quickly determine this by comparing the fullness of the packaging of products of the same weight.
The spraying area is an important indicator of the efficiency of powder coating use, directly related to actual operating costs, and is one of the core dimensions for judging its quality.
High-quality powder coatings have good particle flowability and a high single-pass powder application rate, allowing for a larger coverage area per weight. Generally, the theoretical and actual coverage area of high-quality powder coatings differs little, typically not exceeding 4 square meters. This means that in actual construction, the same weight of powder can cover more workpieces, reducing the number of touch-ups, thus improving construction efficiency and reducing powder cost per unit area.
Inferior powder coatings, due to poor particle flowability and a low powder application rate, will cover a significantly smaller area per weight. This not only leads to frequent touch-ups and extended construction periods but also increases powder consumption, significantly raising usage costs. For example, 20kg of high-quality powder might cover 100 square meters, while 20kg of inferior powder might only cover 80 square meters or even less. Over the long term, the hidden costs of inferior powder are very high. Therefore, when purchasing, inquire with the seller about the theoretical coverage area and estimate based on actual construction scenarios, prioritizing products with high spraying efficiency.
The first-pass powder application rate directly reflects the electrostatic adsorption performance and particle uniformity of powder coatings, and is one of the core technical indicators for judging its quality. It can be judged by the correlation between "film thickness" and "powder usage".
Under the same powder usage, high-quality powder coatings have a higher first-pass powder application rate, resulting in a thicker and more uniform coating film after spraying. This is because the particles of high-quality powder have stable electrical properties and can be uniformly adsorbed on the workpiece surface, achieving the target film thickness without repeated spraying. Conversely, for the same film thickness requirement, high-quality powder requires less powder, effectively saving raw materials.
Inferior powder coatings have a low first-pass powder application rate, unstable particle electrical properties, and some powder cannot be effectively adsorbed on the workpiece surface, leading to an increase in recycled powder. This requires additional powder to achieve the target film thickness, not only increasing powder usage but also affecting subsequent performance due to impurities mixed in with the recycled powder. For example, to spray a coating of the same thickness, high-quality powder may only require 1 kg to cover 10 square meters, while inferior powder may require 1.5 kg or even more, and the uniformity of the coating cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, by comparing the film thickness and powder usage under the same conditions, the quality of the powder can be quickly determined.
The appearance of the finished powder coating after baking is its most direct indicator of quality, mainly judged by three aspects: smoothness, gloss, and stability.
High-quality powder coatings, after high-temperature baking, have a smooth and delicate surface, free from defects such as graininess, pinholes, and runs, with a full texture and uniform and stable gloss. More importantly, the coating of high-quality powder can maintain its gloss for a long time. Even in outdoor environments such as sun and rain, high temperature and humidity, it is not prone to problems such as loss of gloss, chalking, or discoloration, and can maintain a good decorative effect for a long time.
Inferior powder coatings often exhibit numerous appearance problems after baking: a rough surface with noticeable graininess or pinholes; uneven gloss, with some areas bright and others dark; and, more seriously, the gloss cannot be maintained for long, leading to loss of gloss, chalking, and even coating peeling and cracking after a period of use. This is because inferior powder coatings use poor-quality resin, have unreasonable formulations, or uneven pigment dispersion, resulting in an unstable coating structure after curing, making it unable to resist environmental erosion. Therefore, observing the appearance and gloss stability of the finished product after baking is a crucial step in distinguishing the quality of powder coatings.
The adhesion and aging resistance of the coating directly determine the protective performance and service life of the powder coating, and are core indicators for judging its quality.
High-quality powder coatings have strong adhesion to the substrate (such as metal, plastic, etc.), which can be verified through a cross-cut test: Draw a cross on the coating with a blade, apply tape, and then peel it off; the coating should not peel off or only peel off in very small amounts. Meanwhile, high-quality powder coatings possess excellent resistance to natural chalking and long-lasting aging performance. Even after years or even decades of use, the coating film remains intact and shows minimal discoloration under harsh environments such as outdoor UV radiation, temperature changes, and rain erosion, effectively protecting the substrate from corrosion.
Inferior powder coatings, on the other hand, have poor adhesion. After a cross-cut test, the coating easily peels off over large areas, failing to bond firmly to the substrate. Their aging resistance is also extremely poor; chalking, discoloration, and cracking occur within a short period of use, resulting not only in loss of decorative effect but also in loss of protection for the substrate, leading to rust and damage, and significantly shortening the product's lifespan. Therefore, when purchasing, request adhesion test reports and aging test data from the seller, or refer to actual usage cases of similar products, prioritizing powder coatings with strong adhesion and aging resistance.
Product stability is an important standard for measuring the quality control capabilities of powder coating manufacturers and is key to ensuring consistent application results, especially suitable for mass production scenarios.
High-quality powder coating manufacturers have strict quality control systems, with clear standards and procedures for every step, from raw material procurement and formula development to production and finished product testing. Therefore, the batch-to-batch variation in their powder coatings is minimal; the formula is not arbitrarily adjusted, and consistency is maintained across different batches in terms of particle texture, flowability, spraying effect, and post-curing performance. This means that during batch application, issues such as uneven coating color and performance fluctuations due to batch differences will not occur, effectively ensuring product quality uniformity.
In contrast, small manufacturers or inferior powder coating manufacturers have lax quality control. Formulas may be arbitrarily adjusted based on raw material price fluctuations, and production processes lack standardization, leading to significant quality variations between batches. For example, one batch of powder coating may have a full gloss, while the next may have a dull gloss; one batch may have satisfactory adhesion, while the next may experience peeling. Such unstable products can cause significant problems during application and even lead to the scrapping of entire batches. Therefore, when purchasing, prioritize manufacturers with a good reputation, large scale, and strict quality control to ensure batch-to-batch stability.
Distinguishing between good and bad powder coatings is not complicated. The core focuses on seven key dimensions: "feel, volume, spray area, single-pass powder application rate, finished product appearance, adhesion and aging resistance, and product stability." High-quality powder coatings share the following characteristics: smooth and fluffy feel, larger volume for the same weight, wider spray area, high single-pass powder application rate, delicate and stable gloss on the finished product, strong adhesion and aging resistance, and consistent quality between batches.
Mastering these seven points allows for quick and accurate judgment of powder coating quality, whether in daily procurement or actual construction, avoiding problems such as low construction efficiency, high operating costs, and short product lifespan caused by choosing inferior products. In actual purchasing, it is also advisable to combine the manufacturer's qualifications, test reports, and user reviews to prioritize products with high cost-performance and reliable quality, ensuring optimal decorative and protective effects from the powder coating.
Company Phone
+86-21-6420 0566
Working hours
Monday to Friday
Mobile phone:
13816217984
Email:
info@qinsun-lab.com
