Time: Popularity:0times
With rising living standards, health has become a core demand, and the coating industry is adapting accordingly, upgrading towards environmental protection, non-toxicity, and health. The rapid development of nanotechnology, in particular, has led to a qualitative leap in the overall performance of coatings—experiments have shown that as long as nano-antibacterial agents are evenly dispersed in the coating, the antibacterial effect can be significantly improved. Today, antibacterial coatings are increasingly diverse, ranging from nano-antibacterial coatings to various functional products, becoming a popular choice for home decoration and construction projects. However, the quality of antibacterial coatings on the market varies greatly, with many products claiming to be "antibacterial" but failing to live up to the hype. To choose a truly reliable product, the key is understanding antibacterial coating testing—whether the raw materials are safe, whether the antibacterial performance meets standards, and whether it complies with national testing standards. These are the core elements for avoiding pitfalls. Today, we will comprehensively break down the key knowledge points of antibacterial coating testing, from characteristics, raw materials, advantages, standards to testing items, helping you easily avoid purchasing traps.
The popularity of Antibacterial Powder Coating stems from its combination of "practical function + decorative effect," which is also a crucial evaluation criterion during testing. Its most core characteristic is its excellent antibacterial performance—in damp, dark environments where mold easily grows, applying an antibacterial coating to building surfaces (interior walls, exterior walls, ceilings, floors, etc.) effectively inhibits mold growth, keeping the building surface mold-free for a long time. Simultaneously, it must possess excellent decorative properties; the addition of antibacterial ingredients should not compromise aesthetics or user experience. For example, Antibacterial Powder Coating for exterior walls should be water-resistant and weather-resistant like ordinary exterior powder coatings, able to withstand wind, sun, and rain. Antibacterial Powder Coating for interior walls needs excellent scrub resistance, allowing everyday stains to be wiped clean easily, while also having uniform color and a delicate texture to meet the aesthetic needs of home decoration. In short, a good antibacterial powder coating combines functionality and aesthetics, which are the two core aspects that must be considered during testing. The key to achieving these characteristics lies in the antibacterial agents added to the coating – different agents vary greatly in safety and antibacterial efficacy, making them a primary focus of testing.
The antibacterial efficacy and safety of an antibacterial powder coating depend entirely on the added antibacterial agents. Testing will focus on the type and toxicity of these agents. Common agents are divided into two main categories: organic and inorganic.
Commonly used organic antibacterial coating agents include sodium pentachlorophenate, phenylmercuric acetate, carbendazim, and chlorothalonil. Sodium pentachlorophenate and phenylmercuric acetate are highly toxic and require extreme caution when used. Their content is strictly limited during testing to avoid harm to humans and the environment. Carbendazim and chlorothalonil are relatively safer, but they must still comply with national standards for hazardous substances and cannot be added in excess.
Inorganic antibacterial raw materials are mainly nanomaterials, such as nano-silver, nano-copper, and nano-zinc, or composite antibacterial agents synthesized through inorganic nanomaterial doping technology. The advantages of these raw materials are high safety, long-lasting antibacterial effect, and low likelihood of developing drug resistance, making them the mainstream choice for antibacterial coatings. However, it is important to note that due to differences in mold species and usage environments (such as humidity levels and temperatures), different inorganic nanomaterial dopant composites need to be selected specifically to ensure the antibacterial effect—this is also a key focus of testing to ensure that the raw material matches the usage scenario. The core of raw material testing is "safety + effectiveness": on the one hand, it is necessary to check whether highly toxic raw materials are present; on the other hand, it is necessary to confirm whether the raw material can achieve the claimed antibacterial effect, avoiding situations where "only raw materials are added but the standards are not met."
High-quality antibacterial coatings must meet four core advantages, which are also important evaluation criteria during testing. Lacking any one of these may result in a "substandard product":
This is the most crucial advantage. Testing will simulate an environment conducive to mold growth to test the coating's ability to inhibit mold growth over a long period, ensuring the antibacterial effect is not fleeting but stable and long-term.
As mentioned earlier, exterior wall coatings need to be water-resistant and weather-resistant, while interior wall coatings need to be washable and aesthetically pleasing. Testing will verify these properties through professional experiments to ensure that the user experience of antibacterial coatings is no less than that of ordinary high-quality coatings.
Coatings are applied directly to building surfaces, especially interior coatings, which are in long-term contact with people. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that they are non-toxic and harmless. During testing, harmful substances are rigorously screened to ensure the coating poses no health risks to humans or pets.
High-quality antibacterial coatings should use abundant and reasonably priced raw materials. They shouldn't be overpriced simply because antibacterial ingredients are added. Testing also indirectly assesses the suitability of the raw materials, avoiding "high price, low quality." These four advantages are the "passing grade" for antibacterial coatings. If any one of them fails to meet the standard, the product is considered substandard and should not be purchased.
The testing of antibacterial coatings has clear national and industry standards. These are the "hard indicators" for judging whether a product is qualified. When purchasing, be sure to ask the seller to provide a test report that meets the following standards:
HG/T 3950-2007 "Antibacterial Coatings": This is the core industry standard for antibacterial coatings, which clarifies the technical requirements, test methods, and inspection rules for antibacterial coatings. It is the basic standard for testing antibacterial coatings.
GB/T 21866-2008 "Determination of Antibacterial Properties and Antibacterial Effect of Antibacterial Coatings (Films)": This standard specifically stipulates the test methods and evaluation standards for the antibacterial performance of antibacterial coatings. For example, it specifies the antibacterial rate required to be considered qualified, and is a key standard for verifying the antibacterial effect.
GB 18581-2001 "Limits of Hazardous Substances in Solvent-Based Wood Coatings": This standard limits the content of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), benzene, heavy metals, and other harmful substances in solvent-based antibacterial wood coatings. Standard 18582-2008. "Limits of Harmful Substances in Interior Wall Coatings for Interior Decoration and Renovation Materials," strictly limits the content of harmful substances such as VOCs, free formaldehyde, and heavy metals in antibacterial interior wall coatings to ensure indoor air quality and human health. These standards are the baseline; any qualified antibacterial coating must meet the corresponding standard requirements. If a vendor cannot provide a test report that meets these standards, or if the indicators on the report do not meet the standards, you should definitely avoid them.
The testing items for antibacterial coatings mainly focus on two core dimensions: detection of toxic and harmful substances and detection of microbial toxins. This is also the key to avoiding pitfalls; only when both standards are met can the product be considered truly qualified.
The testing will focus on identifying various toxic and hazardous substances in the paint to ensure their content is within national standard limits. Common testing items include:
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): Excessive amounts can pollute indoor air, causing dizziness, nausea, and other discomfort;
Benzene compounds: Including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, these are toxic, and long-term exposure can harm health;
Formaldehyde: Free formaldehyde is a strong carcinogen and has a strong irritant effect on the respiratory tract and skin;
Free diisocyanates: These are toxic and may trigger allergic reactions;
Other harmful substances: Methanol, halogenated hydrocarbons, and heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, chromium, and mercury. These substances accumulate in the environment and pose a long-term threat to human health and the ecological environment.
The core function of antibacterial coatings is to inhibit microbial growth. Testing will target common harmful bacteria to ensure the coating's effective antibacterial properties. Commonly tested bacteria include: * **Bacteria:** Such as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (E. coli). These bacteria may cause skin infections, gastrointestinal discomfort, and other health problems. * **Molds:** Such as Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus, Penicillium wannii, Penicillium cordifolium, Chaetomium buddingii, etc. These molds can cause mold growth on walls, produce odors, and may also trigger respiratory allergies. It is important to note that while HG/T 3950-2007 does not explicitly list specific bacteria for testing, it clearly requires testing according to standards such as GB 18581 and GB 18582 to ensure both antibacterial and safety standards are met.
In an era prioritizing health, antibacterial powder coating is indeed a good choice for improving quality of life. However, the key to choosing the right product lies in understanding the testing—avoiding products that are "fake antibacterial" or "toxic." Remember the "3 Looks, 1 Must" principle:
Prioritize products that primarily use inorganic antibacterial raw materials such as nano-silver and nano-zinc, and avoid coatings containing highly toxic raw materials such as sodium pentachlorophenate and phenylmercuric acetate.
Confirm that the product complies with national/industry standards such as HG/T 3950-2007 and GB/T 21866-2008. Indoor coatings must also comply with GB 18582-2008. Hazardous substance limits;
Ensure that tests for toxic and harmful substances (VOCs, formaldehyde, benzene compounds, heavy metals, etc.) and microorganisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger, etc.) meet standards;
When purchasing, always ask the seller to provide a test report issued by an authoritative institution. Do not buy products without test reports or with substandard test indicators. Testing antibacterial coatings may seem complex, but by grasping the key points, you can easily avoid pitfalls. For consumers, taking the time to understand this testing knowledge is taking responsibility for their own and their family's health; for businesses, only by strictly adhering to standards and ensuring that product testing meets standards can they establish themselves in the market. Hopefully, this guide to avoiding pitfalls will help you choose truly safe and effective antibacterial coatings, making health protection ubiquitous.
Company Phone
+86-21-6420 0566
Working hours
Monday to Friday
Mobile phone:
13816217984
Email:
info@qinsun-lab.com
